The Annals Visit the PharmaCE website!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy: Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 274-276.
© 1983 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slaughter, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lanc, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slaughter, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lanc, R.


Research Articles

Theophylline clearance in obese patients in relation to smoking and congestive heart failure

RL Slaughter and RA Lanc

The effect of obesity on the total body clearance (Cltot) of theophylline was evaluated in nonsmokers and smokers with and without congestive heart failure (CHF). The obese patients were compared with similar nonobese subjects with regard to age, sex, and disease state. The total patient population numbered 150 adults. Cltot of theophylline, based on total body weight (TBW), averaged 0.60 +/- 0.20 ml/min/kg in obese nonsmokers and did not differ from the nonobese, nonsmoking group. In obese nonsmoking patients with CHF, Cltot based on TBW was 0.40 +/- 0.14 ml/min/kg, which was similar to Cltot values in nonsmoking CHF patients who were not obese. A trend toward a reduction in Cltot, based on TBW, as TBW increased, in nonsmoking patients with and without CHF, was observed. In contrast to the Cltot in nonsmokers, the Cltot of theophylline in obese smokers with and without CHF was similar to the Cltot values in nonobese populations only when based on ideal body weight. However, when compared with nonsmoking, nonobese patients, no differences were observed when Cltot was corrected for TBW. These findings suggest that theophylline maintenance dose can be based on TBW in obese patients who are smokers and nonsmokers (with and without CHF), using the average Cltot obtained for the nonsmoking patients with and without CHF.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1983 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.