The Annals Summaries of the Latest Medical Research!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy: Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 411-417.
© 1983 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zola, E.
Right arrow Articles by McLeod, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zola, E.
Right arrow Articles by McLeod, D.


Research Articles

Comparative effects and analgesic efficacy of the agonist-antagonist opioids

EM Zola and DC McLeod

Pentazocine, butorphanol, nalbuphine, and buprenorphine are mixed agonist-antagonist opioids that are effective analgesics, with less abuse potential than the agonists morphine, propoxyphene, and codeine. The dual properties of the agonist-antagonists are largely explained by their varying actions at the postulated three types (mu, chi, and sigma) of opioid receptors. The agonist-antagonists are classified as either morphine-like or nalorphine-like, based on their acute effects and withdrawal symptoms after chronic dosing. Buprenorphine is morphine-like, while the other drugs are nalorphine-like. These agents vary in the duration of analgesia, with pentazocine having a mean action of three hours and buprenorphine greater than six hours. The hemodynamic effects of nalbuphine and buprenorphine generally resemble those of morphine, while pentazocine and butorphanol increase cardiac workload, blood pressure, and pulmonary artery pressure. The agonist-antagonists have ceilings for respiratory depression, whereas the agonists produce dose-dependent depression. Agonist-antagonists generally produce less increase in biliary ductal pressure than does morphine. The major clinical limitations are that agonist-dependent patients may experience unpleasant subjective effects, when treated with the agonist-antagonists, and the nalorphine-like agents can produce psychotomimetic effects. More clinical experience is needed to rank the abuse potential within this group of opioids. The newer agents are being studied for oral use in acute and chronic pain.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1983 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.