The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy: Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 34-38.
© 1984 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hadler, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hadler, N.


Research Articles

The argument for aspirin as the NSAID of choice in the management of rheumatoid arthritis

NM Hadler

In view of their costliness, the use of newer NSAIDs is justified if they are demonstrably more effective, less toxic, or better tolerated than aspirin (ASA). However, there is no evidence that any is more effective than ASA, and their widely assumed comparable effectiveness has not been demonstrated convincingly. In terms of clinically meaningful overt and even occult gastrointestinal blood loss, ASA is indistinguishable from the newer NSAIDs. Most NSAIDs evoke fewer unpleasant gastrointestinal symptoms than ASA does, although current recording of such symptoms has magnified the ASA experience. Prescribing a new NSAID before ASA requires a heuristic assertion of comparable effectiveness, misconception of overt toxicities, and belief in the meaningfulness of data demonstrating differential tolerance. The trade-off is increased expense and unknown long-term toxicity.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1984 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.