The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy: Vol. 18, No. 12, pp. 974-976.
© 1984 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, E.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, E.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, T.


Research Articles

Review of the status of intermittent positive pressure breathing therapy

ER Gonzalez and TG Burke

With the advent of diagnosis related groups reimbursement schedules, the cost-effectiveness of therapies needs to be assessed. The safety and efficacy of intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB) has been controversial. IPPB employs the dilating effects of positive-pressure ventilation to deliver aerosolized particles to small and medium-sized bronchi of patients with obstructive airways disease. IPPB is expensive to implement and maintain. The hazards of IPPB (infection, pneumothorax, decreased cardiac output), although rare, could prolong hospital stays. Except for severely ill patients with fatigued respiratory muscles, IPPB offers no advantages over the less costly and safer compressor-nebulizer or metered-dose delivery of a beta-agonist.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1984 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.