The Annals
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy: Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 247-252.
© 1984 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evens, R.
Right arrow Articles by Shahan, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evens, R.
Right arrow Articles by Shahan, D


Research Articles

The reliability and utility of clinical competency assessments for drug monograph preparation by pharmacy students

RP Evens, JH Littlefield, and D Shahan

This educational research project evaluated the utility and reliability of an evaluation system designed to assess the clinical competency of pharmacy students in the preparation and presentation of a comparative drug monograph. The educational program consisted of a mini-course to review drug information resources and skills and a drug information clinical clerkship. The evaluation system for student performance (competency) included 15 criteria (competency areas), a set of descriptors for each criterion, and a scaling mechanism. This competency assessment system for monograph services quantified the overall level of competency and identified specific strong and weak competency areas. The reliability of the system was good in general (standardized alpha-coefficient = 0.701), over time, and among several preceptors. Students indicated that the system was fair and provided them with feedback. Clinical competency assessment should be structured to minimize subjectivity and must be tested for reliability; then, such evaluations can become more consistent and equitable.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1984 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.