The Annals Visit the PharmaCE website!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy: Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 425-427.
© 1985 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howrie, D.
Right arrow Articles by Venkataramanan, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howrie, D.
Right arrow Articles by Venkataramanan, R


Research Articles

Anaphylactoid reactions associated with parenteral cyclosporine use: possible role of Cremophor EL

DL Howrie, RJ Ptachcinski, BP Griffith, RJ Hardesty, JT Rosenthal, GJ Burckart, and R Venkataramanan

Acute anaphylactoid reactions occurred immediately after initiation of intravenous infusions of cyclosporine in three patients post-organ transplantation. Shortness of breath, flushing, tachypnea, chest pain, pruritus, or urticaria were noted; rapid recovery followed cessation of drug infusion. Subsequently, oral cyclosporine has been used in each patient without recurrence of the observed reaction. The presence of Cremophor EL as an emulsifying agent in the parenteral dosage formulation of cyclosporine is a likely etiology for this acute adverse reaction. Slowed rates of drug infusion and antihistamine premedication may permit continued intravenous cyclosporine use in affected patients.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1985 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.