The Annals
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy: Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 69-73.
© 1986 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, J.
Right arrow Articles by Durst, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, J.
Right arrow Articles by Durst, N.


Research Articles

Experience with intrainstitutional clinical evaluations of newly marketed preparations as a basis for drug-product selection to hospital formularies

JA Green, WA Clementi, MG Bufton, JA Farringer, R Moiser, and NL Durst

The decision to admit a new drug-product formulation (NDPF) to a hospital pharmacy formulary is a difficult task, particularly when minimal pharmacokinetic or clinical efficacy data are available. To provide objective information to the Pharmacy and Therapeutics (P&T) Committee, we implemented a procedure to evaluate these NDPFs at our institution. This procedure, termed clinical evaluation, was initiated at our institution in 1981. The clinical evaluations of two NDPFs were performed. The two NDPFs studied were a transdermal nitroglycerin preparation and a sustained-release procainamide preparation. The clinical assessment of the therapeutic and the pharmacokinetic performance of each preparation was made by clinical pharmacists. Following completion of the clinical evaluation, the data were presented at a regular meeting of the P&T committee. The presentation of clinical data derived from our patient population facilitated objective assessment by the P&T committee regarding formulary status. We conclude that the clinical evaluation represents a novel approach to acquire data necessary for objective decisions on NDPFs by the P&T committee.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1986 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.