The Annals Take our Readership Survey!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy: Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 118-121.
© 1986 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaughan, L.
Right arrow Articles by Milavetz, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaughan, L.
Right arrow Articles by Milavetz, G


Research Articles

Evaluation of the Ames Seralyzer for therapeutic drug monitoring of theophylline

LM Vaughan, MM Weinberger, and G Milavetz

Dry reagent technology and reflectance photometry are combined in the Ames Seralyzer to offer a solid-phase plastic strip assay methodology. Light reflected from serum placed on the antibody-impregnated strip is quantitated with a two-point standard curve to display a theophylline result in 90 seconds. The accuracy and precision of the Seralyzer for serum theophylline are compared to the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (Emit) which is commonly used to determine drug concentrations. Liquid calibrators (5 and 25 micrograms/ml) and liquid-spiked sera (10, 15, and 20 micrograms/ml) were measured six times daily simultaneously by both methods for twenty days. Eighty patient samples (theophylline range: 0-33 micrograms/ml) were measured twice each during the twenty days. Acceptable assay limits were established and maintained by measuring 15 micrograms/ml spiked sera prior to and during the evaluation period. All within-run and between-run means for the Seralyzer and Emit were within +/- 1 microgram/ml of the spiked value. All ranges of within-run and between-run means were within +/- 2 micrograms/ml of the spiked value. Mean between-run coefficients of variation for the Seralyzer at the 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 micrograms/ml values were 11.5, 6.7, 4.9, 4.6, and 4.9 percent, respectively. Linear regression on the 80 patient samples gave a slope of 1.02, intercept of -0.28, and correlation of 0.984. The Seralyzer's accuracy and precision compare favorably with Emit for theophylline determinations greater than 7.5 micrograms/ml.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1986 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.