The Annals Evolution of Clinical Pharmacy | Now Available
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy: Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 187-192.
© 1987 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCormack, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schentag, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCormack, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schentag, J.


Research Articles

Potential impact of quantitative susceptibility tests on the design of aminoglycoside dosing regimens

JP McCormack and JJ Schentag

Therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides currently applies pharmacokinetic principles to maintain peak concentrations between 4 and 10 micrograms/ml and troughs less than 2 micrograms/ml. These predetermined concentrations are based on statistical rates of cure and incidences of adverse effects. At present, recommended serum concentration ranges for aminoglycosides (as with other antibiotics) do not specifically target the susceptibility of the individual organism, but compensate only for altered clearance due to diseases. The design of antibiotic regimens based on both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics is called dual individualization. Logically, the pharmacodynamic parameters, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the organism and the postantibiotic effect (PAE), should also play a significant role in design of the dosing regimen. Simulations were performed to examine the consequences of designing aminoglycoside regimens considering both disease effects on excretion and bacterial susceptibility (MIC and PAE). The application of dual individualization concepts to aminoglycosides argues for a wider range of dosage requirements than observed with regimens that maintain desired peaks and troughs. If these concepts are accepted, some patients will clearly require more aminoglycoside than is currently used, and others can be managed with substantially less. The aminoglycoside therapeutic window, as it is now conceived, could be markedly different in the future.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1987 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.