The Annals Summaries of the Latest Medical Research!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy: Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 427-431.
© 1987 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Emory, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cuddy, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Emory, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cuddy, P.


Research Articles

Should dihydroergotamine-heparin be used for prevention of postoperative thromboembolism?

CE Emory and PG Cuddy

The combination of heparin 5000 U and dihydroergotamine 0.5 mg (HDHE) was marketed in the U.S. in 1985 for prophylaxis of postoperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT). This article evaluates the efficacy, safety, and cost of HDHE for abdominal, pelvic, thoracic, and total hip surgical prophylaxis. Although several controlled trials comparing HDHE to minidose heparin (MDH) indicate superior efficacy of HDHE for nonorthopedic surgical procedures, others do not. Differences in study design and insufficient sample sizes may account for the dichotomy. In the U.S. Multicenter Trial, MDH was surprisingly ineffective for preventing radiofibrinogen uptake test-proven DVT. The apparent superiority of HDHE over MDH is therefore questionable. Ergot-related side effects have been minimized in all studies due to careful patient selection. In actual use, the potential for such side effects appears to be increased. Because twice-daily HDHE is no more effective, costs 4-11 times more, and may pose a greater risk than MDH, the authors do not recommend its use for general surgical prophylaxis. HDHE may prove to be useful in patients undergoing total hip replacement.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1987 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.