The Annals Take our Readership Survey!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy: Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 502-504.
© 1987 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mikhail, M.
Right arrow Articles by Catania, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mikhail, M.
Right arrow Articles by Catania, P.


Research Articles

Using a hand-held spirometer as a monitoring tool in chronic theophylline therapy

MN Mikhail and PN Catania

This study evaluates the use of a hand-held spirometer (pocket spirometer, Buhl type) in monitoring pulmonary function as a part of a homebased pharmacokinetic service for patients with respiratory disease. To calibrate the spirometer and determine its accuracy, six healthy volunteers were trained in its use by the pharmacist. Forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were determined for each volunteer once a month for six months. The T test for the presence of outliers showed no statistical difference at p less than 0.05. Seven patients on chronic therapy with theophylline derivatives for respiratory problems were randomly referred by their physicians to the pharmacokinetic service. The pharmacist counseled each patient and measured FVC and FEV1 once a month for six months. The ratio, (FEV1:FVC) X 100, was calculated for each patient before and after steady-state serum level determination and dosage adjustment. The mean value for this ratio was 45.1 before pharmacokinetic intervention and 57.5 after intervention. Using the Student's t-test, these results were significant (p less than 0.05). The correlation coefficient was calculated to determine if a correlation existed between the increase in the ratio and the increase in serum theophylline levels. Serum levels were ordered before and after intervention for five of the seven patients receiving pharmacokinetic intervention. The change in serum levels vs. change in the ratio was associated with a correlation coefficient of 0.718. Monitoring pulmonary function may be a useful adjunct for the pharmacist who provides pharmacokinetic counseling to patients with respiratory disease, but expanded studies are needed to judge the value of routine spirometric measurements on homebased patients.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1987 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.