Professional liability for pharmacists: a focus on pharmacy practice acts

The increased complexity of pharmacotherapeutics and the expanded role of pharmacists in the drug-use process may bring about an increased liability exposure for failure to conform to a professional standard of care. Therefore, a survey of 51 state pharmacy practice acts was conducted: (1) to establish a nationwide statutory definition of pharmacy practice, and (2) to outline possible use of the statutes in civil and administrative law. Twenty percent of state statutes contain no definition of pharmacy practice. Of the remaining 41 states, dispensing (97.5 percent), compounding (92.5 percent), interpretation and evaluation of prescriptions (68.2 percent), and consultation (73 percent) are legally defined. Pharmacokinetic consultation, drug administration, pharmacist prescribing, and pharmaceutical research are defined in one, seven, four, and one state(s), respectively. Pharmacists may face legal responsibilities from both the courts and state boards of medical and pharmacy practice. Aggressively updating the statutes and regulations to reflect contemporary pharmacy practice may provide a mechanism for a defense in court litigation and regulatory action.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. L Doering Prescribing Authority for Pharmacists, Florida Style: A Home Run or a Swing and a Miss? Ann. Pharmacother., November 1, 2007; 41(11): 1878 - 1883. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. R. Manasse Jr. and M. K. Speedie Pharmacists, pharmaceuticals, and policy issues shaping the work force in pharmacy Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., June 15, 2007; 64(12): e30 - e48. [Full Text] [PDF]