The Annals Summaries of the Latest Medical Research!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy: Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 475-480.
© 1988 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, A.
Right arrow Articles by Crismon, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wells, A.
Right arrow Articles by Crismon, M.


Research Articles

Neuroleptic rechallenge after neuroleptic malignant syndrome: case report and literature review

AJ Wells, RW Sommi, and ML Crismon

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is associated with essentially all of the currently available antipsychotic agents. The signs and symptoms associated with the syndrome are hyperpyrexia, defined by body temperature greater than 38 degrees C; extreme muscle rigidity, with or without elevated creatine phosphokinase or hyperreflexia; and other symptoms such as altered level of consciousness and/or autonomic dysfunction as manifested by labile blood pressure, tachycardia, tachypnea, urinary or fecal incontinence, pallor, or diaphoresis. This potentially fatal syndrome complicates the treatment of patients with recurrent psychotic symptoms because of the possibility for recurrence of the NMS. A case of recurrent NMS is presented in which the patient was rechallenged with an antipsychotic agent. In addition, 41 reported cases of antipsychotic rechallenge after NMS are reviewed. The results of the review suggest that neuroleptic rechallenge following NMS is associated with an acceptable risk of recurrence in most patients. However, close monitoring for NMS and careful selection of patients for antipsychotic rechallenge is mandatory. A minimal time period of five days before rechallenge may also reduce the risk of recurrent NMS. Recurrence was not associated with patient age or gender, nor the antipsychotic agent used.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
S. R. White
Acute Dystonic Reaction and the Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, June 1, 2005; 18(3): 175 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1988 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.