The Annals
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DICP, The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 23, No. 11, pp. 899-904.
© 1989 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rapp, R.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rapp, R.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, T.


Research Articles

Patient-controlled analgesia: a review of effectiveness of therapy and an evaluation of currently available devices

RP Rapp, BA Bivins, RA Littrell, and TS Foster

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is a major advance in the management of pain in postoperative and cancer patients. The success of PCA has resulted in a proliferation of marketed devices to administer small bolus doses of parenteral pain-control drugs at fixed intervals controlled by the patient with the push of a button. Because patients demonstrate marked individual variation in pain medication requirements, PCA devices should be able to accommodate rapidly changing requirements for drugs with a minimum amount of effort on behalf of health care personnel. Crude electronic devices were developed in the late 1960s and the early 1970s and usually consisted of a syringe pump connected to some sort of timing device. Most modern PCA devices marketed in the past five years are much more sophisticated devices that are microprocessor based and some newer devices even generate hard copy for a permanent record of drug administration. Although many such devices are available (including a totally disposable PCA device), few have undergone extensive clinical evaluation. A review of the literature shows many devices are available for use without a single publication to document the safety and utility of the device in the routine patient care situation. Use of the PCA method of pain control will grow, and all hospital-based health care personnel should become familiar with their use and limitations.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Oncol Pharm PractHome page
M. Ackermann, S. Maier, H. Ing, and P. Bonnabry
Evaluation of the design and reliability of three elastomeric and one mechanical infusers
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, June 1, 2007; 13(2): 77 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
E. A. Skryabina and T. S. Dunn
Disposable infusion pumps.
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 1, 2006; 63(13): 1260 - 1268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1989 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.