The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DICP, The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 389-394.
© 1989 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernandez de Gatta, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dominguez-Gil, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fernandez de Gatta, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dominguez-Gil, A


Research Articles

Predictive techniques applied to imipramine therapeutic drug monitoring

MM Fernandez de Gatta, M Tamayo, MJ Garcia, C Montojo, J Ramon Gutierrez, F Rey, and A Dominguez-Gil

The aim of this study was to establish the performance of pharmacokinetic methods employing little data on serum drug concentrations obtained in routine therapeutic drug monitoring of imipramine. Forty-three and 123 serum levels were obtained in 8 adult depressive patients (aged 57-80 y) and 34 enuretic children (aged 5-13 y), respectively. Forecasting of the serum concentrations was performed based on mean population pharmacokinetic parameters (method A), with knowledge of one steady-state serum concentration (method B), and from two or more steady-state serum concentrations (method C). The accuracy and precision of each method were evaluated from the mean prediction error (ME) and from the root mean squared prediction error (RMSE), respectively. The values of ME and RMSE of methods B and C proved to be significantly lower than those found using method A. Method C was the most precise and accurate in both populations. Method A underestimates the serum concentrations observed in adults (ME greater than 0) but overestimates them in children (ME less than 0), although to a lesser extent. The study shows that it is possible to obtain a good estimation of individual dosage needs from one or more serum concentrations obtained at steady state. Clinical application of these methods (B and C) yields an increase in the efficiency and safety of the treatment, particularly in special populations such as geriatric and pediatric patients.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1989 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.