 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Research Articles |
This prospective, randomized, controlled trial, based in a Veterans Administration Hospital general medicine clinic, compared the cost effectiveness of two behaviorally oriented interventions designed to reduce physicians' drug prescribing costs. Clinical pharmacists visited one group of 11 physicians during weekly clinic sessions to counterdetail the prescribing of certain targeted drugs. A second group of 10 physicians were given data each week comparing their individual prescribing costs to those of their colleagues (peer-comparison feedback). A control group of 10 physicians received neither intervention. Written patient-specific suggestions for cost-effective prescribing were employed in both intervention groups. Baseline prescribing costs were monitored through the hospital's computer during a three-month, preintervention period and a seven-month intervention period. The 2026 written suggestions made by the doctors of pharmacy resulted in 613 (30.3 percent) prescribing changes, including deletion, substitution, or change in dosage of targeted drugs. There were no intergroup differences in the response to written suggestions. However, the group receiving face-to-face visits from the clinical pharmacists achieved lower average prescription costs than the control group during seven of eight months. Intergroup differences were statistically significant (p less than 0.05) during three of the last five months of the study. The face-to-face meeting intervention was cost-effective, saving +478 per physician over seven months after accounting for Pharm.D. salary costs. There was no significant decrease in the number of prescriptions written by the face-to-face group compared with the control group, suggesting that drug substitution rather than deletion was the method used by physicians to lower drug costs. No savings resulted from the use of peer-comparison feedback. We conclude that personal visits by a Pharm.D. are a cost-effective technique for reducing physicians' prescribing costs, and are superior to peer-comparison feedback.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. A. Boom, C. S. Nelson, L. E. Laufman, A. E. Kohrt, and C. A. Kozinetz Improvement in Provider Immunization Knowledge and Behaviors Following a Peer Education Intervention Clinical Pediatrics, October 1, 2007; 46(8): 706 - 717. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Chaudhry, J. Wang, S. Wu, M. Maglione, W. Mojica, E. Roth, S. C. Morton, and P. G. Shekelle Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care Ann Intern Med, May 16, 2006; 144(10): 742 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C A Brown, C R Belfield, and S J Field Cost effectiveness of continuing professional development in health care: a critical review of the evidence BMJ, March 16, 2002; 324(7338): 652 - 655. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Sherertz, E. W. Ely, D. M. Westbrook, K. S. Gledhill, S. A. Streed, B. Kiger, L. Flynn, S. Hayes, S. Strong, J. Cruz, et al. Education of Physicians-in-Training Can Decrease the Risk for Vascular Catheter Infection Ann Intern Med, April 18, 2000; 132(8): 641 - 648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. L O'Connell, D. Henry, and R. Tomlins Randomised controlled trial of effect of feedback on general practitioners' prescribing in Australia BMJ, February 20, 1999; 318(7182): 507 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. A. Balas, S. M. Austin, J. A. Mitchell, B. G. Ewigman, K. D. Bopp, and G. D. Brown The Clinical Value of Computerized Information Services: A Review of 98 Randomized Clinical Trials Arch Fam Med, May 1, 1996; 5(5): 271 - 278. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. A. Davis, M. A. Thomson, A. D. Oxman, and R. B. Haynes Changing Physician Performance: A Systematic Review of the Effect of Continuing Medical Education Strategies JAMA, September 6, 1995; 274(9): 700 - 705. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
