The Annals
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DICP, The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 87-93.
© 1990 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Denig, P
Right arrow Articles by Zijsling, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Denig, P
Right arrow Articles by Zijsling, D.


Research Articles

Impact of a drug bulletin on the knowledge, perception of drug utility, and prescribing behavior of physicians

P Denig, FM Haaijer-Ruskamp, and DH Zijsling

The impact of a drug bulletin was tested in a randomized controlled trial that included 186 family physicians. The length of the trial was six months. It was hypothesized that printed information, such as in drug bulletins, influences physician prescribing behavior by changing their knowledge of drug efficacy and adverse effects and their perceptions of drug utility. Therefore, the impact of a drug bulletin was evaluated on these domains of influence. Interview data were used to assess changes in knowledge, perceived drug utility, and stated prescribing. Health insurance funds' records were used to collect actual prescribing data. Information in the bulletin on the treatment of renal colic changed physicians' knowledge as well as perceived utility of drugs used for renal colic (p less than 0.05). Significant changes in stated prescribing were also found. On the other hand, advice in the same bulletin on the treatment of the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) had no impact at all. It did not even improve the knowledge of the physicians about the drugs used for IBS. Apparently, the message about the treatment of IBS failed to gain the attention of the physicians. It is suggested that some messages are sufficiently transmitted through written information, and others that are seen as less relevant or too difficult to implement need more intensive strategies.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
C. R. Dormuth, M. Maclure, K. Bassett, C. Jauca, C. Whiteside, and J. M. Wright
Effect of periodic letters on evidence-based drug therapy on prescribing behaviour: a randomized trial
Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 26, 2004; 171(9): 1057 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1990 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.