The Annals
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DICP, The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 24, No. 10, pp. 1001-1006.
© 1990 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wiley, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wiley, S.


Research Articles

Amiodarone: a postmarketing evaluation of monitoring for drug-induced toxicity

JA Murphy, BM Fitzsimons, MA Meute, WC Wilkinson, JC Luck, and SW Wiley

Amiodarone, an antiarrhythmic drug with predominantly class III effects, has demonstrated serious adverse drug reactions and interactions. The Departments of Pharmacy and Cardiology retrospectively evaluated the monitoring parameters at this institution. Criteria based on current literature were developed. Twenty-six patients were administered amiodarone, qualifying for entry into the audit. Of these patients, seven were excluded because their medical records were unavailable or incomplete. The 19 eligible patients were hospitalized during initiation of therapy and followed in the Outpatient Cardiology Clinic. The collected data extracted from the medical charts were compared with the following elements of the criteria selected: baseline evaluation prior to the start of therapy; monitoring for signs of pulmonary, hepatic, thyroid, cardiac, ophthalmologic, neurologic, and dermatologic toxicity; and evaluation of potential drug interactions with digoxin and warfarin-type anticoagulants. The percentage of criteria elements appropriately monitored on each patient ranged from 82 to 100 percent, with an average of 91 percent. The most frequently overlooked parameters were warning the patient of a possible photosensitivity reaction, decreasing the digoxin dose if the patient was concurrently taking amiodarone, and performing a slit-lamp examination every six months. Frequent examination of the patient's total organ system and laboratory tests, in addition to patient education, are essential to safe monitoring of amiodarone therapy.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1990 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.