The Annals
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DICP, The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 24, No. 12, pp. 1166-1168.
© 1990 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sobotka, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cook, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sobotka, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cook, B.


Research Articles

A retrospective study of compliance with recommended hematologic monitoring of carbamazepine

JL Sobotka, B Alexander, and BL Cook

Early case reports of fatal hematologic effects associated with carbamazepine (CBZ) resulted in manufacturer recommendations for extensive laboratory monitoring. Several alternative monitoring protocols have been published, indicating disagreement with those recommendations. The manufacturer has removed specific monitoring guidelines allowing physicians to monitor CBZ during treatment based on their clinical judgment. This study was designed to determine the frequency of CBZ hematologic monitoring in one academic setting. Data on complete blood counts (CBCs) were retrospectively obtained and were compared with 1975-88 Physicians' Desk Reference recommendations for weekly CBCs during the first three months of treatment. Eighty-three patients were identified: 32 psychiatry, 37 neurology, and 14 from other clinics. Only one patient met guidelines for monitoring during the entire first three months of treatment. Comparisons between clinics demonstrated no statistically significant differences in monitoring rates. Prospective studies in academic and private practice settings are needed to provide more information on actual monitoring practices. Due to the removal of specific manufacturer recommendations, a standard approach is needed to establish consistent and adequate monitoring and to provide legal support to prescribers.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1990 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.