The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DICP, The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 25, No. 11, pp. 1231-1235.
© 1991 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gundlach, C.
Right arrow Articles by Faulkner, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gundlach, C.
Right arrow Articles by Faulkner, T.


Research Articles

Charge and reimbursement analysis for intensive care unit patients in a large tertiary teaching hospital

CA Gundlach and TP Faulkner

Hospital charge and reimbursement data were analyzed for 115 patients admitted to the surgical intensive care and burn-trauma units at Brigham and Women's Hospital over a two-month study period. A skewed distribution of hospital charges resulted in mean and median charges of $43,068 and $29,081, respectively. Major differences were observed in total charges among major diagnostic groups. The median charge was highest in orthopedic trauma and neurosurgery patients. The median charge across major diagnostic groups correlated with the length of stay in the unit and in the hospital, and the number of drugs used. The median percent reimbursement from private providers, Medicaid, Medicare, and health maintenance organizations was 93, 55, 40, and 30 percent, respectively, and 55 percent overall. Reimbursement was high from private providers regardless of major diagnostic group. Medicare reimbursement through the diagnostic reference group system was considerably higher in cardiothoracic patients (77 percent) than in other major diagnostic groups. The discrepancy between charge and Medicare reimbursement in these patients was consistent with that reported for intensive care units in other hospitals, thereby underscoring the need for cost containment and more realistic reimbursement methods.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1991 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.