The Annals the journal of Pharmacy Technology
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DICP, The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 25, No. 12, pp. 1368-1373.
© 1991 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kehoe, W.
Right arrow Articles by Hetnal, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kehoe, W.
Right arrow Articles by Hetnal, M.


Research Articles

Early individualization of tricyclic antidepressant dosing using a Bayesian pharmacokinetic model

WA Kehoe, AF Harralson, JA Kwentus, JJ Jacisin, WB Sheffel, and MJ Hetnal

Existing methods to prospectively dose tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) require either specific test doses, precisely timed serum sampling, or both. We prospectively tested a new pharmacokinetic model that allows flexible dosing and sampling to determine maintenance requirements in patients receiving TCAs. Thirty-four patients entered the study. Drug concentrations were measured on the third day after starting TCA therapy. These values were analyzed using a Bayesian pharmacokinetic model to determine drug clearance and volume of distribution. This information was then used to predict the serum concentration resulting from a maintenance dose chosen by the psychiatrist. In phase I (n = 17), patients received imipramine without specific starting doses. Phase II (n = 17) was performed to provide a preliminary evaluation of the method in the usual clinical environment. In this phase, patients received either amitriptyline, imipramine, desipramine, doxepin (75 mg on day 1,100 mg on day 2), or nortriptyline (50 mg on day 1, 75 mg on day 2). Lower doses were allowed if clinically indicated. The predictability of future serum concentrations was then compared between the two phases. The mean prediction errors (model bias) in phases I and II were -15.5 +/- 27.3 and -12.3 +/- 21.8 ng/mL and were not different (p greater than 0.05). The absolute prediction errors (model precision) were 18.5 +/- 25.1 and 18.8 +/- 16.0 ng/mL and were not different (p greater than 0.05). Two slow metabolizers were identified (clearance less than 0.10 L/kg/h). This new method allows the determination of maintenance dose requirements early in therapy without standard test doses or specifically timed serum sampling.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1991 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.