The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DICP, The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 119-122.
© 1991 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Broyles, J.
Right arrow Articles by Luther, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Broyles, J.
Right arrow Articles by Luther, R.


Research Articles

Pharmacist interventions improve fluid balance in fluid-restricted patients requiring parenteral nutrition

JE Broyles, RO Brown, KL Vehe, RJ Nolly, and RW Luther

Many intensive care unit (ICU) patients require parenteral nutrition (PN) and fluid restriction, making delivery of adequate nutrition difficult. We studied the effects of pharmacist interventions on fluid balance in fluid-restricted ICU patients requiring PN. Twenty patients were randomized to the treatment group (dextrose 70% injection [D70W] plus 15% amino acids for PN, 25-mL piggybacks, selected drugs added to the PN solution) or the control group (D70W plus 10% amino acids, 50- or 100-mL piggybacks). Each group contained 10 patients and they were not significantly different for age, gender, weight, hospital days, and serum albumin concentration. The duration (9.3 +/- 1.2 vs. 9.7 +/- 2.4 d) and doses of PN (29 +/- 6.8 vs. 28.7 +/- 6.9 kcal/kg/d; 1.1 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.4 g/kg/d protein) were similar between treatment and control groups. Mean fluid intake (3112 +/- 1146 vs. 3498 +/- 1111 mL/d), fluid balance (146 +/- 1581 vs. 708 +/- 1402 mL/d), and cumulative fluid balance (1358 vs. 6867 mL) were all significantly lower in the treatment group. Mean fluid output was similar between the two groups. Pharmacist interventions can significantly decrease intake and result in a better fluid balance in fluid-restricted ICU patients who require PN.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
L. L. Leape, D. J. Cullen, M. D. Clapp, E. Burdick, H. J. Demonaco, J. I. Erickson, and D. W. Bates
Pharmacist Participation on Physician Rounds and Adverse Drug Events in the Intensive Care Unit
JAMA, July 21, 1999; 282(3): 267 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1991 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.