The Annals Take our Readership Survey!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DICP, The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 25, No. 9, pp. 914-918.
© 1991 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edelstein, H.
Right arrow Articles by McCabe, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edelstein, H.
Right arrow Articles by McCabe, R.


Research Articles

Intravenous or intramuscular teicoplanin once daily for skin and soft-tissue infections

HE Edelstein, SE Oster, VA Chirurgi, RA Karp, KB Cassano, and RE McCabe

Teicoplanin is a new glycopeptide antibiotic with potent activity against gram-positive bacteria and pharmacokinetics that allow once daily administration. To study the efficacy and safety of teicoplanin for skin and soft-tissue infections, 75 patients received teicoplanin intravenously (38) or intramuscularly (37, of which 16 were outpatients). Of 62 clinically evaluable patients, 97 percent of teicoplanin iv and 93 percent of teicoplanin im patients were cured or improved. All teicoplanin iv patients and 64 percent of teicoplanin im patients were cured microbiologically at 24-48 hours posttherapy. Persistence of organisms frequently was associated with skin ulcers or abscess cavities and usually had no bearing on clinical outcome. Possible adverse clinical and laboratory reactions caused by teicoplanin occurred in 4 of 38 teicoplanin iv patients (11 percent) and in 8 of 37 teicoplanin im patients (22 percent). Reactions were mild and resolved with discontinuation of teicoplanin in most cases. In this study, teicoplanin appeared to be safe, efficacious, and convenient for both hospital staff and patients, and potentially cost-effective for the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections. In particular, teicoplanin appears to be appropriate for outpatient parenteral therapy.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1991 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.