The Annals Visit the PharmaCE website!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 26, No. 10, pp. 1215-1220.
© 1992 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Noyes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ramirez, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Noyes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ramirez, R


Research Articles

Evaluation of glipizide and glyburide in a health maintenance organization

MA Noyes, BL Carter, DK Helling, WC McCormick, and R Ramirez

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there was a difference in the long-term glycemic control, average daily dose, and cost of therapy in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) treated with glyburide and glipizide in a health maintenance organization (HMO). DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of medical and pharmacy records. SETTING: Multispecialty group practice HMO. PATIENTS: 140 NIDDM patients being treated with either glyburide (n = 70) or glipizide (n = 70) were randomly selected from the populations of patients receiving either drug using computerized pharmacy records. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean daily doses and blood glucose measurements (fasting blood glucose, random blood glucose, hemoglobin A1C) were stratified in 3-month periods from the time the drug therapy was started or the patient first presented to the clinic for a total of 18 months. Long-term glycemic control was defined as fasting blood glucose less than 8.33 mmol/L (150 mg/dL). RESULTS: The groups were comparable with regard to age (53.4 y glyburide, 56.7 y glipizide), gender (43 M:27 F glyburide, 47 M:23 F glipizide), race (38 W/16 B/16 H glyburide, 45 W/16 B/9 H glipizide), concurrent medical conditions, adverse effects, and compliance. Long-term glycemic control was similar in both groups. Although the number of subjects who were controlled (by definition) tended to be greater in the glyburide group, no clinical or statistical difference was found. There was no statistical difference in mean daily dose between the ethnic groups, but the small numbers preclude further analysis. The glipizide group had a larger percentage increase in dose within the first year than did the glyburide group; however, the percentage increase from the 3-month dose was similar after 18 months (22.7 percent glyburide, 27.5 percent glipizide.) Average daily cost of therapy, based on mean daily dose, was slightly lower for glyburide-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: If glycemic control is similar with glyburide and glipizide, as seen in this study, economic considerations regarding choice of therapy and formulary inclusion may be appropriate.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Diabetes EducatorHome page
M.-M. G. Wilson, F. E. Kaiser, and J. E. Morley
Tablet-Breaking Ability of Older Persons With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
The Diabetes Educator, July 1, 2001; 27(4): 530 - 540.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. DiabetesHome page
S. B. Leichter
Assessing New Products in Diabetes: A Business Model in Support of Clinical Decision-Making
Clin. Diabetes, April 1, 2001; 19(2): 78 - 80.
[Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1992 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.