The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 26, No. 10, pp. 1221-1226.
© 1992 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pleasants, R.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pleasants, R.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, J.


Research Articles

Compatibility of ceftazidime and aminophylline admixtures for different methods of intravenous infusion

RA Pleasants, LM Vaughan, DM Williams, and JL Fox

OBJECTIVE: Aminophylline and ceftazidime are sometimes used concurrently in patients with respiratory disorders. Parenteral aminophylline usually is administered as a constant infusion, and ceftazidime is given intermittently or less commonly as a constant infusion. We evaluated the stability and compatibility of the two drugs when aminophylline is given as a constant intravenous infusion and ceftazidime is administered simultaneously either through a y-site (piggyback method) or as a continuous infusion (constant infusion method). DESIGN: The chemical stability of intravenous aminophylline and ceftazidime in dextrose 5% and NaCl 0.9% for both methods was studied. Three different formulations of ceftazidime from the same manufacturer were studied (minibag using reconstituted ceftazidime, premixed minibag, and ceftazidime arginine). For the piggyback and constant infusion methods, samples were collected at 0, 1, and 2 hours; and 0, 6, and 24 hours, respectively. All experiments were conducted in triplicate. Samples were analyzed in duplicate by a stability-indicating HPLC assay method. OUTCOME MEASURE: Ceftazidime and aminophylline were considered stable if concentrations remained above 90 percent of the original concentrations over the time periods studied. RESULTS: Ceftazidime was determined to be compatible with aminophylline in the piggyback method. In contrast, when aminophylline and ceftazidime were admixed in the same intravenous container (constant infusion method), the two drugs were not stable. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that aminophylline and ceftazidime admixtures are incompatible when prepared in the same intravenous container, which may occur if both are given as a constant infusion. The two drugs are compatible when the ceftazidime is piggybacked into a primary intravenous set in which aminophylline is administered as a constant infusion.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
H. Servais and P. M. Tulkens
Stability and Compatibility of Ceftazidime Administered by Continuous Infusion to Intensive Care Patients
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2001; 45(9): 2643 - 2647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1992 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.