The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 26, No. 11, pp. 1383-1384.
© 1992 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, E.
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, E.
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, M.


Research Articles

Adjunctive medications in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy: a multicenter prospective assessment. The Virginia Multicenter Thrombolytic Study Group

ER Gonzalez, LA Jones, JP Ornato, GC Bleecker, and MJ Strauss

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of adjunctive therapies in patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving thrombolytic agents. DESIGN: Data were collected prospectively by the study-site investigator or the emergency department physician caring for the patient. Study participation did not influence thrombolytic regimen selection or the adjunctive therapies ordered. SETTING: Thirteen Virginia hospitals representing a cross-section of hospitals in the state. Eleven are urban medical centers; four have graduate medical education programs. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were included in the study if the decision to administer thrombolytic therapy was made in the emergency department. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Concomitant medications administered during the first six hours after initiation of thrombolytic therapy. RESULTS: Two hundred ten patients (aged 57 +/- 14.1 y) were evaluated. Ninety-five percent of these patients were treated with tissue plasminogen activator, 3 percent received anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex, and 2 percent received streptokinase. Ninety-one percent of the patients also received heparin, the most commonly used adjunctive medication; 77 percent concomitantly received lidocaine; 62 percent received aspirin; and only 19 percent received a beta-blocker. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide a reference point for future studies to determine factors that influence the selection of adjunctive agents for treating patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving thrombolytics.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1992 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.