The Annals Summaries of the Latest Medical Research!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 68-73.
© 1993 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farris, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kirking, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farris, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kirking, D.


Research Articles

Assessing the quality of pharmaceutical care. I. One perspective of quality

KB Farris and DM Kirking

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concept of pharmaceutical care (PC) as a standard of quality care for ambulatory pharmacy practice. DATA SOURCES: Donabedian's article on the seven pillars or characteristics of quality provides a framework for a discussion of the merits of PC as a definition of quality. A MEDLINE search augmented by a manual review of International Pharmacy Abstracts was also used to identify pertinent English-language pharmacy literature; indexing terms included quality, community pharmacy services, ambulatory, pharmacy services, and pharmacist(s). STUDY SELECTION: Representative articles and studies promoting PC were considered. DATA EXTRACTION: The literature was independently reviewed by the primary author. DATA SYNTHESIS: An interpretation of the principles of Donabedian's article was applied to PC. PC appears to be consistent with the quality characteristics of efficacy and acceptability. The effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and efficiency of PC should be firmly established by its practitioners as barriers are eliminated and/or overcome. The pillars of optimality, equity, and legitimacy seem to be overlooked under the current definition of PC. This article contends that PC assumes an individualist definition of quality, by definition, because of its covenantal relationship with the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Quality is defined in terms of the values of individuals and society. For now, PC appears to be the appropriate standard for defining quality in pharmacy because of the importance of individual maximal benefits within our society.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
R. M. Clifford, W. A. Davis, K. T. Batty, and T. M.E. Davis
Effect of a Pharmaceutical Care Program on Vascular Risk Factors in Type 2 Diabetes: The Fremantle Diabetes Study
Diabetes Care, April 1, 2005; 28(4): 771 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1993 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.