The Annals Evolution of Clinical Pharmacy | Now Available
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 11-16.
© 1994 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pitcher, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pitcher, A

Research Articles

Peripheral intravenous line survival and phlebitis prevention in patients receiving intravenous antibiotics: heparin/hydrocortisone versus in-line filters

GW Roberts, MD Holmes, RE Staugas, RA Day, CF Finlay, and A Pitcher

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of in-line filtration with the addition of heparin/hydrocortisone (hep/hc) to the infusate for both phlebitis prevention and intravenous (i.v.) line survival in peripheral i.v. catheters. This study was specific for a patient group receiving prolonged courses of i.v. antibiotics. Analysis of the two endpoints for conventional short i.v. catheters (short lines) versus long (30 cm) i.v. catheters (long lines) was also performed. METHODS: Patients with cystic fibrosis receiving intermittent i.v. antibiotics were randomly allocated to receive their drugs either through an in-line filter using a drug-free infusate or with no filter and an infusate containing heparin 500 units and hydrocortisone 10 mg/L. Infusion sites were assessed daily. RESULTS: Both the hep/hc and filter groups were similar in terms of phlebitis incidence and i.v. line survival when analyzed separately for both short and long lines. Long lines displayed markedly prolonged survival times and reduced phlebitis compared with short lines. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of i.v. filters in excluding the large particle load introduced by i.v. antibiotics and hence in reducing the subsequent phlebitis makes them a useful alternative to the use of hep/hc. The use of filters in this patient group may offer advantages in terms of ease of use and a possible decrease in hep/hc-related problems. Long lines offer practical advantages over short lines for patients requiring longer term i.v. access.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ChestHome page
M. Monreal, F. Quilez, C. Rey-Joly, S. Rodriguez, N. Sopena, C. Neira, and J. Roca
Infusion Phlebitis in Patients With Acute Pneumonia: A Prospective Study
Chest, June 1, 1999; 115(6): 1576 - 1580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. B. Rosen, V. G. Fowler Jr., G. R. Corey, S. M. Downs, A. K. Biddle, J. Li, and J. G. Jollis
Cost-Effectiveness of Transesophageal Echocardiography To Determine the Duration of Therapy for Intravascular Catheter-Associated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
Ann Intern Med, May 18, 1999; 130(10): 810 - 820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1994 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.