The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 528-535.
© 1994 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S.


Research Articles

Medicaid policies for HIV-related drug therapies: perspectives of the state affiliates of the American Pharmaceutical Association

RJ Buchanan and SR Smith

OBJECTIVES: To determine how Medicaid prescription drug policies differ by state, and to assess how these policies affect pharmacies and the drug therapies available to Medicaid patients with HIV infection or tuberculosis. EVALUATION PROCESS: The state affiliates of the American Pharmaceutical Association (APhA) were surveyed to learn how state Medicaid policies impact the provision of prescription drugs to Medicaid patients within their state. The survey focused on Medicaid payment level incentives, Medicaid payments compared with private payments, Medicaid utilization policies, and incentives and disincentives in each state's Medicaid payment system. RESULTS: Approximately two-thirds of the APhA affiliates reported that the Medicaid payment levels in their states for drugs used to treat HIV-related illnesses were at least moderately below private payment levels; in 11 states these Medicaid payments were substantially below those of private payers. Many APhA affiliates responding to the survey stated that the Medicaid program in their state limited the number of reimbursed drugs that Medicaid patients can receive. Eight APhA affiliates reporting that these utilization limits created restrictions on the ability of Medicaid patients with AIDS and HIV-related infections to receive needed medications. CONCLUSIONS: With Medicaid programs becoming the major payers of AIDS-related healthcare, federal policies should standardize Medicaid coverage, payment, and utilization policies for prescription drugs needed by Medicaid recipients with HIV-related conditions. This would enable Medicaid patients to receive necessary and adequate drug therapies regardless of their state of residence. These federally mandated policies also would require an increased federal role in financing this expanded Medicaid drug coverage.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
B. S. Finkelstein, J. B. Silvers, U. Marrero, D. Neuhauser, and L. Cuttler
Insurance Coverage, Physician Recommendations, and Access to Emerging Treatments: Growth Hormone Therapy for Childhood Short Stature
JAMA, March 4, 1998; 279(9): 663 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1994 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.