Estimation of total body and extracellular water using single- and multiple-frequency bioimpedance

OBJECTIVE: To determine the precision and bias of single- and multiple-frequency bioimpedance estimates of total body water (TBW) and extracellular water (ECW) volumes in comparison with the true values for these volumes established by gold standard dilution techniques. DESIGN: Controlled, prospective, open-label investigation. SETTING: Private, not-for-profit university-affiliated, acute care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Normal, healthy men (n = 8) and women (n = 6) volunteers, 25-46 years of age. INTERVENTIONS: A single oral dose of a mixture of deuterium oxide 10 g and bromine 30 mmol; bioimpedance analysis pre- and three hours postmixture administration. MAIN OUTCOME PARAMETERS: TBW and ECW volumes established by deuterium oxide and bromine dilutional spaces (gold standards), respectively, and single- and multiple-frequency bioimpedance estimates of those same volumes. RESULTS: The mean multiple-frequency bioimpedance (MFB) and single frequency bioimpedance (SFB) estimates of TBW, 41.2 and 42.1 L, respectively, were not statistically different (NS) from the 41.2 L deuterium oxide value. Although the two methods had similar precision (NS), MFB was less biased. For ECW, the mean MFB and SFB values of 19.5 and 24.8 L, respectively, were significantly different from the bromine value of 18.8 L (p = 0.013 and p = 0.001, respectively). MFB was the more precise and less biased predictor of ECW. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with SFB, the MFB approach is a more precise and less biased predictor of TBW and ECW volumes in young, healthy adults, and may offer more accurate assessment in subjects with aberrant physiology.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Shiota, C. M Ryan, K.-L. Chiu, P. Ruttanaumpawan, J. Haight, M. Arzt, J. S Floras, C. Chan, and T D. Bradley Alterations in upper airway cross-sectional area in response to lower body positive pressure in healthy subjects Thorax, October 1, 2007; 62(10): 868 - 872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Earthman, D. Traughber, J. Dobratz, and W. Howell Bioimpedance Spectroscopy for Clinical Assessment of Fluid Distribution and Body Cell Mass Nutr Clin Pract, August 1, 2007; 22(4): 389 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C. Buchholz, C. Bartok, and D. A. Schoeller The Validity of Bioelectrical Impedance Models in Clinical Populations Nutr Clin Pract, October 1, 2004; 19(5): 433 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. L. Cox-Reijven, B. van Kreel, and P. B Soeters Bioelectrical impedance measurements in patients with gastrointestinal disease: validation of the spectrum approach and a comparison of different methods for screening for nutritional depletion Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2003; 78(6): 1111 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Smith, B. Engel, A. M Diskin, P. Spanel, and S. J Davies Comparative measurements of total body water in healthy volunteers by online breath deuterium measurement and other near-subject methods Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2002; 76(6): 1295 - 1301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Cai, S. Holm, M. Jenstrup, M. Stromstad, A. Eigtved, J. Warberg, L. Hojgaard, L. Friberg, and N. H. Secher Electrical admittance for filling of the heart during lower body negative pressure in humans J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2000; 89(4): 1569 - 1576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Matthie, B. Zarowitz, A. De Lorenzo, A. Andreoli, K. Katzarski, G. Pan, and P. Withers Analytic assessment of the various bioimpedance methods used to estimate body water J Appl Physiol, May 1, 1998; 84(5): 1801 - 1816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. De Lorenzo, A. Andreoli, J. Matthie, and P. Withers Predicting body cell mass with bioimpedance by using theoretical methods: a technological review J Appl Physiol, May 1, 1997; 82(5): 1542 - 1558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]