The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 28, No. 7, pp. 940-943.
© 1994 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gallego, C
Right arrow Articles by Pallardo, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gallego, C
Right arrow Articles by Pallardo, L.


Research Articles

Interaction between probucol and cyclosporine in renal transplant patients

C Gallego, P Sanchez, C Planells, S Sanchez, E Monte, E Roma, J Sanchez, and LM Pallardo

OBJECTIVE: To investigate a possible interaction between probucol and cyclosporine during coadministration. DESIGN: Before/after trial of 15 weeks' duration. SETTING: Clinical pharmacokinetics laboratory of a teritiary care center. PATIENTS: Ten renal transplant patients who were immunosuppressed with cyclosporine therapy for at least six months and who had been receiving probucol for more than eight weeks. METHODS: Patients continued to receive probucol during the first five weeks of the trial (phase A). Probucol then was discontinued until the end of the trial (phase B). Blood samples from each patient were collected at weekly intervals during phase A and again during the last five weeks of phase B. Samples were assayed by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (TDx) to determine trough concentrations of the cyclosporine parent compound in whole blood, and of cyclosporine and metabolites in whole blood and in plasma. Comparison of the data was performed using a paired t-test. RESULTS: An increase in trough concentrations of cyclosporine was observed in phase B (without probucol) with respect to phase A (with probucol). These differences were statistically significant for the cyclosporine parent compound in whole blood (p = 0.02), and for cyclosporine and metabolites in whole blood (p = 0.02) and in plasma (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When cyclosporine and probucol are coadministered in transplant patients, a close monitoring of cyclosporine concentrations is advised because probucol can induce a decrease in trough concentrations of cyclosporine.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1994 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.