The Annals Take our Readership Survey!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 120-124.
© 1995 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tornatore, K.
Right arrow Articles by Venuto, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tornatore, K.
Right arrow Articles by Venuto, R.


Research Articles

Repeated assessment of methylprednisolone pharmacokinetics during chronic immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients

KM Tornatore, KA Reed, and RC Venuto

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetics of methylprednisolone in renal transplant recipients on 2 occasions separated by at least 1 month during chronic immunosuppression. DESIGN: A prospective unblinded trial. PATIENTS: Ten renal transplant recipients (aged 25-62 years) evaluated in a public university-affiliated hospital clinic. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received their chronic oral dose of methylprednisolone as a 10-20-minute intravenous infusion during the 2 study periods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum methylprednisolone concentrations were determined by HPLC and were used to generate the pharmacokinetic parameters of the drug. RESULTS: During study 1, which ranged from 1.2 to 24 months posttransplant, the mean +/- SD methylprednisolone dose was 13.2 +/- 6.4 mg. In study 2 (2.5-38.5 mo posttransplant), the mean dose was 10.6 +/- 3 mg. During both study periods, methylprednisolone concentrations exhibited a monoexponential decline. Considerable variability in methylprednisolone clearance was observed between periods in certain patients. Four of the 10 patients demonstrated a reduction in clearance from study 1 to study 2, which ranged from a 28% to a 53% decrease. Two patients exhibited an increase in clearance of 40% and 49%. The mean +/- SD total body clearance in study 1 was 363 +/- 330 mL/min/kg, whereas the mean volume of distribution was 1.18 +/- 0.53 L/kg. The mean elimination rate constant was 0.29 +/- 0.14 h-1, with a mean serum half-life of 2.87 +/- 1.15 h during the first phase. In study 2, the mean methylprednisolone clearance was 261 +/- 150 mL/min/kg (p > 0.05) and the mean volume of distribution was 0.89 +/- 0.31 L/kg (p > 0.05). The mean serum half-life of methylprednisolone was 2.91 +/- 0.60 h (p > 0.05), with the mean elimination rate constant of 0.25 +/- 0.06 h-1 (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that intrapatient variability in methylprednisolone clearance exists among certain renal allograft recipients. As a result of the observed variability, patients who are continued on the same dose of methylprednisolone during the posttransplant period of chronic immunosuppression will be subjected to a changing pattern of exogenous glucocorticoid exposure. The impact of these changing patterns requires further prospective evaluation.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1995 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.