The Annals Summaries of the Latest Medical Research!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 378-380.
© 1995 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matuschka, P.
Right arrow Articles by Vissing, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matuschka, P.
Right arrow Articles by Vissing, R.


Research Articles

Clinafloxacin-theophylline drug interaction

PR Matuschka and RS Vissing

OBJECTIVE: To report an apparent pharmacokinetic interaction between clinafloxacin and theophylline in a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). CASE SUMMARY: A patient with a history of COPD was admitted for a fracture of the right femoral neck. Admission medications included extended-release theophylline 400 mg bid. The initial serum theophylline concentration was 81.03 mumol/L (normal 55-110). A subsequent concentration was subtherapeutic (46.62 mumol/L) and the theophylline dosage was increased to 300 mg tid. Therapeutic steady-state concentrations were achieved. The patient later developed pneumonia and was enrolled in a study of nosocomial acquired pneumonia involving clinafloxacin versus ceftazidime. He was randomized to receive clinafloxacin 200 mg iv q12h. After clinafloxacin therapy was initiated, the serum theophylline concentration increased into the toxic range (155.96 mumol/L). Theophylline administration was held for 2 doses and the dosage then reduced to 200 mg tid. Serum concentrations decreased to within the therapeutic range. DISCUSSION: The fluoroquinolones have been shown to interact with the hepatic metabolism of theophylline and increase serum theophylline concentrations. The quinolone metabolite, 4-oxoquinolone, inhibits the N-demethylation of theophylline, leading to a decrease in the clearance of theophylline. The resultant rise in theophylline concentrations corresponds with the decrease in clearance and possible toxicity. In our patient, careful monitoring of theophylline concentrations and dosage adjustments resulted in the restoration of therapeutic serum concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The observation of this drug interaction between clinafloxacin and theophylline suggests a need for prudent monitoring of theophylline concentrations. Dosage adjustments may be warranted when this combination of medications is used. Such action may prevent significant toxicities and prolonged hospitalization. Further controlled clinical trials in healthy volunteers are needed to substantiate the interaction between clinafloxacin and theophylline.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1995 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.