The Annals the journal of Pharmacy Technology
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 523-529.
© 1995 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gales, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gales, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gales, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gales, B.


Research Articles

Rapid infusion of amphotericin B in dextrose

MA Gales and BJ Gales

OBJECTIVE: To review the data examining the use of rapid infusion of amphotericin B in dextrose infusions. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search of the English-language literature and review of pertinent references' bibliographies was used to identify articles evaluating the effect of amphotericin B infusion rates on the incidence of adverse reactions. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Controlled and uncontrolled studies involving humans are reviewed; emphasis is placed on recent comparative trials. Pertinent information, as judged by the authors, was selected for discussion. DATA SYNTHESIS: Amphotericin B, a polyene antifungal agent with significant toxicity, remains the agent of choice for many serious fungal infections. The potential benefits of rapid administration of amphotericin B in reducing the incidence and/or severity of adverse reactions were noted soon after its introduction. Recent studies have examined the tolerability of rapid (0.75-1 h) amphotericin B infusions. Results of studies assessing the tolerability of rapid amphotericin B infusions suggest that tolerance to infusion-related reactions develops during therapy. Comparative trials have obtained variable results. The comparative trials supporting rapid amphotericin B infusion have generally used crossover designs, enrolled small numbers of patients, and excluded patients with significant renal or cardiovascular dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid amphotericin B infusions should be avoided during initiation of therapy when infusion-related reactions tend to be most problematic, and in patients with cardiovascular disease, renal dysfunction, and potassium disorders because of the potential risk for cardiac arrhythmias. The literature currently available is conflicting and insufficient to support the routine use of rapid amphotericin B infusion.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1995 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.