The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 663-666.
© 1995 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rider, J.
Right arrow Articles by Notman, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rider, J.
Right arrow Articles by Notman, D.


Research Articles

Water handling in patients receiving haloperidol decanoate

JM Rider, TF Mauger, JP Jameson, and DD Notman

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether water handling in patients receiving haloperidol decanoate (HD) was impaired. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled trial of water handling in patients without symptomatic hyponatremia receiving HD. Eligibility for study inclusion required that patients had received HD for at least 4 months, were not taking any medication reported to cause inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion or hyponatremia (excluding haloperidol), and would agree to participate in the study. An age- and gender-matched healthy control subject was enrolled for each study patient. Baseline laboratory values were obtained within 48 hours prior to the standard water-loading test to screen for abnormalities in electrolytes, kidney function, and liver function. A 20-mL/kg water-load test was administered to each patient. Urine volume and osmolality were measured every hour for 4 hours. SETTING: A community mental health (CMH) outpatient psychiatric facility for the patients receiving HD and Saint Mary's Health Services for the controls. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen patients receiving HD from the CMH facility and 15 age- and gender-matched control subjects were enrolled. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Impaired water handling was defined as a failure to dilute urine to less than 100 mmol/kg or a failure to excrete more than 65% of a water load in 4 hours. RESULTS: Five patients receiving HD were excluded because of protocol refusal or violation. Five of 10 evaluable patients receiving HD had abnormal water handling. Two of these could not lower their urine osmolality to less than 100 mmol/kg, 2 could not excrete more than 65% of the water load, and 1 did not meet either criteria. None of the healthy volunteers had abnormal free water handling. The difference between the study patients and the control subjects was statistically significant (p = 0.0097). CONCLUSIONS: Fifty percent of our study patients receiving HD had abnormal free water handling. This finding, combined with our clinical observations of symptomatic hyponatremia in other patients receiving the drug, suggests the need to investigate the incidence of hyponatremia and to design a useful screening tool to identify patients at risk. In the meantime, clinicians should be aware of the potential for impaired water handling in patients receiving HD.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
E. J. Hoorn, J. Lindemans, and R. Zietse
Development of severe hyponatraemia in hospitalized patients: treatment-related risk factors and inadequate management
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 70 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1995 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.