The Annals the journal of Pharmacy Technology
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 719-725.
© 1995 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sacristan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sacristan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, J.


Research Articles

Use of confidence intervals and sample size calculations in health economic studies

JA Sacristan, SJ Day, O Navarro, J Ramos, and JM Hernandez

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the calculation and application of confidence intervals in pharmacoeconomic studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: The increasing frequency with which pharmacoeconomic evaluations are made within clinical trials makes it possible to obtain information on the outputs and costs of an intervention in each patient of a sample under study. This allows the same statistical principles commonly used in clinical trials to be applied to cost or cost-effectiveness data. The methodology described in this article would allow expression of cost-effectiveness ratios in the form of confidence intervals. The calculation of the cost-effectiveness ratio by means of a confidence interval may have important practical consequences, both in decision-making on the choice of 1 intervention versus another and in calculating the size of the sample necessary to identify statistically significant differences, from both clinical and economic points of view. CONCLUSIONS: The complementary use of confidence intervals and sensitivity analysis makes it possible to measure uncertainty related and unrelated to variability in sample data, allowing the decision to adopt 1 technology or another to be based on the most objective information available. Although several ethical and methodologic concerns remain to be addressed, this methodology may contribute to improving the more rational and efficient use of drugs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
A. H. Briggs and A. M. Gray
Power and Sample Size Calculations for Stochastic Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Med Decis Making, April 1, 1998; 18(2): S81 - S92.
[Abstract] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1995 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.