The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 29, No. 9, pp. 843-847.
© 1995 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caraco, Y
Right arrow Articles by Levy, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caraco, Y
Right arrow Articles by Levy, M


Research Articles

Carbamazepine pharmacokinetics in obese and lean subjects

Y Caraco, E Zylber-Katz, EM Berry, and M Levy

OBJECTIVE: To compare carbamazepine pharmacokinetic parameters between obese and lean subjects following the administration of a single 200-mg tablet. DESIGN: Single-dose intervention, open study. SETTING: Teaching university hospital. SUBJECTS: Eighteen obese (group A) otherwise healthy subjects, referred to the metabolic outpatient clinic, and 13 healthy lean (group B) volunteers. Inclusion criterion for the obese subjects was a body mass index (BMI = weight/height2) of more than 30 kg/m2. In the obese group, mean +/- SD total body weight (TBW), BMI, and percent of ideal body weight (IBW) were 111.4 +/- 19.9 kg, 38.8 +/- 6.0 kg/m2, and 182.7% +/- 30.7%, respectively. These values were significantly greater than the respective values of 63.2 +/- 8.3 kg, 22.4 +/- 1.6 kg/m2, and 105.8% +/- 5.8% obtained in the lean group (p < 0.001). INTERVENTION: Single-dose oral administration of carbamazepine 200-mg tablet (Teril, Taro, Israel). OUTCOMES: Carbamazepine elimination half-life (t1/2), apparent volume of distribution (Varea/F), and its oral clearance (Clpo/F) were derived from the drug concentration-time curves. RESULTS: Carbamazepine Varea/F and t1/2 were significantly greater in group A than in group B (98.4 +/- 26.9 vs. 60.7 +/- 8.5 L, respectively, p < 0.001; and 59.4 +/- 14.7 vs. 31.0 +/- 5.0 h, respectively, p < 0.001), but its Clpo/F was reduced only slightly in obese as compared with lean subjects (19.8 +/- 5.2 vs. 23.0 +/- 4.6 mL/min, respectively, p = 0.07). Correction for IBW yielded similar results for Varea/F and t1/2, but Clpo/F per kg of IBW was significantly smaller in the obese than in the lean subjects (0.32 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.39 +/- 0.06 mL/min/kg of IBW, respectively, p < 0.02). Linear correlations were observed between Varea/F and TBW for both group A (r = 0.92, p < 0.001) and group B (r = 0.77, p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with lean subjects, carbamazepine Varea/F is significantly greater in obese subjects and its t1/2 is markedly prolonged. The minor nonsignificant effect of obesity on carbamazepine Clpo/F suggests that in obese subjects the carbamazepine daily dose should be based on IBW, not on TBW.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1995 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.