The Annals the journal of Pharmacy Technology
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 31-34.
© 1996 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lesar, T.
Right arrow Articles by Briceland, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lesar, T.
Right arrow Articles by Briceland, L.


Research Articles

Survey of antibiotic control policies in university-affiliated teaching institutions

TS Lesar and LL Briceland

OBJECTIVE: To determine the type and extent of antibiotic control policies currently in use in a group of university-affiliated teaching institutions. DESIGN: A survey of antibiotic control policies and procedures (e.g., antibiotic order sheets, formulary restrictions, automatic stop orders for specific indications) was developed. SETTING: The University Hospital Consortium (UHC), a nonprofit group of academic health centers located in 33 states throughout the US. PARTICIPANTS: The survey was mailed to 60 UHC members. RESULTS: The survey was returned by 48 (80%) institutions. Most hospitals use either restrictions (81%) and/or official recommendations (56%) to manage antibiotic use. Antibiotics were restricted most commonly by service or unit (69%), indication (69%), or to the infectious disease service (60%). Antibiotic order sheets are used in 21 (44%) of the hospitals, of which 14 require completion by the prescriber. Monitoring of compliance with established restrictions is primarily the responsibility of the pharmacist processing the order (84%) and/or a clinical pharmacist (53%). When an order does not comply with restrictions or compliance cannot be determined, the prescriber is contacted prior to dispensing in 77% and 83% of the cases, respectively. In cases of noncompliance in which the prescriber refuses to alter an order to meet restrictions, 40% of hospitals refuse to dispense the drug and 35% dispense the drug but refer the case to another authority (infectious disease service or pharmacy and therapeutics committee). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the widespread use of antibiotic control programs, further investigation of the success of such programs in optimizing drug therapy, improving patient outcome, and cutailing the antibiotic budget within and among specific institutions is warranted.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
G. S. Itokazu, D. N. Schwartz, K. W. Garey, K. A. Rodvold, L. H. Danziger, and R. A. Weinstein
Pharmacists' perceptions of the effectiveness of antimicrobial control programs
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., December 15, 2006; 63(24): 2504 - 2508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
M. Shetka, J. Pastor, and P. Phelps
Evaluation of the defined daily dose method for estimating antiinfective use in a university hospital
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., November 1, 2005; 62(21): 2288 - 2292.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
C. L Feucht and L. B Rice
An Interventional Program to Improve Antibiotic Use
Ann. Pharmacother., May 1, 2003; 37(5): 646 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1996 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.