The Annals Summaries of the Latest Medical Research!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 43-54.
© 1996 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sorensen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Abel, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sorensen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Abel, S.


Research Articles

Comparison of the ocular beta-blockers

SJ Sorensen and SR Abel

OBJECTIVE: To compare the similarities and differences among the ocular beta-blockers. Important considerations when comparing these agents are the differences in systemic adverse effects, local tolerability, and cost. DATA SOURCE: Information was retrieved from a MEDLINE search of the English-language literature and bibliographic reviews of review articles. Index terms included beta-blockers, glaucoma, timolol, levobunolol, betaxolol, metipranolol, and carteolol. STUDY SELECTION: Emphasis was placed on eyedrop studies, as well as properly designed and executed clinical trials that assessed dosage, dosing interval, therapeutic response, adverse effects, and cost. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from several studies were evaluated according to the study design, therapeutic response, and adverse effects. DATA SYNTHESIS: Timolol maleate, levobunolol, metipranolol, and carteolol have similar effectiveness in lowering intraocular pressure; however, levobunolol and timolol gel forming solution may have an advantage of once-daily dosing. Studies have not been published comparing the clinical efficacy of timolol hemihydrate with that of other ocular beta-blockers. Metipranolol is cost effective in treating primary open-angle glaucoma; however, it has been associated with more ocular burning, stinging, and granulomatous anterior uveitis than other agents. The intrinsic sympathomimetic activity of carteolol has not yet displayed a definite advantage over the other agents in terms of optic disk perfusion and systemic adverse effects. The control of intraocular pressure with betaxolol has not always been as good as with timolol; however, betaxolol has some advantages over timolol and the other topical beta-blockers in terms of systemic adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Considering cost, efficacy, and safety, timolol maleate is the recommended formulary agent because the other agents cannot consistently show an outstanding advantage.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
P G Watson, M F Barnett, V Parker, and J Haybittle
A 7 year prospective comparative study of three topical {beta} blockers in the management of primary open angle glaucoma
Br. J. Ophthalmol., August 1, 2001; 85(8): 962 - 968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
R. A. Laibovitz, A. M. VanDenburgh, C. Felix, R. David, A. Batoosingh, A. Rosenthal, and J. Cheetham
Comparison of the Ocular Hypotensive Lipid AGN 192024 With Timolol: Dosing, Efficacy, and Safety Evaluation of a Novel Compound for Glaucoma Management
Arch Ophthalmol, July 1, 2001; 119(7): 994 - 1000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
L. M van Beek, M. Mulder, N. J van Haeringen, and A. Kijlstra
Topical ophthalmic beta blockers may cause release of histamine through cytotoxic effects on inflammatory cells
Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2000; 84(9): 1004 - 1007.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1996 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.