Antithymocyte immunoglobulin in severe aplastic anemia and bone marrow transplantation

OBJECTIVE: To review antithymocyte immunoglobulin (ATG) and its current role in the treatment of severe aplastic anemia (SAA), focusing on ATG in immunosuppressive therapy compared with bone marrow transplantation (BMT). DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1966 to 1996) of English-language literature and human subjects pertaining to ATG and BMT therapy in SAA was performed. Additional literature was obtained from reference lists of pertinent articles identified through the search. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All articles were considered for possible inclusion in the review. Pertinent information, as judged by the authors, was selected for discussion. DATA SYNTHESIS: The hallmark of SAA is pancytopenia and bone marrow hypoplasia. Although the etiology in a majority of cases remains unknown, current data implicate an immune-mediated destruction of stem cells. ATG is a potent immunosuppressive agent and has emerged as an important therapy for patients with SAA. The exact mechanism of immunosuppressive action is not fully understood, although ATG appears to disrupt cell-mediated immune responses resulting in inhibition or altered T-cell function. Numerous trials have evaluated the use of ATG both as monotherapy and in combination with other immunosuppressive agents. Treatment with ATG in SAA has demonstrated a 40-70% response rate. Data suggest that intensive immunosuppressive therapy with ATG in combination with cyclosporine may provide the optimal immunosuppressive treatment. Questions still remain concerning complications and long-term survival of the patients. Although more than a 2-year follow-up shows a decline in mortality, a plateau in the survival curve was not achieved. BMT is a potential treatment for SAA. Although there is a high initial mortality due to treatment-related toxicities, successful marrow engraftment provides a cure for SAA. Many patients (75-90%) experience long-term survival after allogenic BMT. Age, donor availability, and severity of disease limit the number of eligible patients. CONCLUSIONS: Due to excellent results with BMT, it has become the therapy of choice for selected patients with SAA. For patients who are not eligible for BMT, intensive immunosuppressive therapy with ATG and cyclosporine is recommended. Further study to better understand the pathogenesis of SAA and prevent treatment-related complications is essential to provide the best care to all patients.