The Annals Summaries of the Latest Medical Research!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 30, No. 12, pp. 1381-1386.
© 1996 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pabis, D.
Right arrow Articles by Crismon, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pabis, D.
Right arrow Articles by Crismon, M.


Research Articles

Evaluation of inpatient depot antipsychotic prescribing

DJ Pabis, PG Dorson, and ML Crismon

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of fluphenazine decanoate and haloperidol decanoate in an inpatient setting. DESIGN: A prospective observational study conducted over a 3-month period. SETTING: A 400-bed state psychiatric hospital. INTERVENTIONS: The psychiatric pharmacy staff evaluated the medical records and new orders of 30 consecutive patients receiving depot antipsychotic formulations using a detailed evaluation form and the hospital pharmacy computer database. Criteria for evaluation were derived from the medical literature and product information, and included the following areas: diagnosis, stabilization on a short-acting form of the antipsychotic, appropriateness of dosage conversion to depot therapy, concomitant administration of short-acting antipsychotics (and duration of concomitant medications), and plasma concentration monitoring. RESULTS: Only 7 patients (23%) received what would be considered optimal depot antipsychotic therapy. These patients were receiving a stable dosage of a short-acting antipsychotic prior to conversion to depot therapy (i.e., > or = 7 d), received optimal dose conversion to a depot form, and received optimum overlap with a short-acting preparation (i.e., overlap < or = 7 d with fluphenazine HCI and 7-30 d with haloperidol HCI). When length of stay data were evaluated, no significant differences were observed in patients who received optimal therapy versus those who did not. There was also no difference in length of stay when the study group was compared with an age-, sex-, and diagnosis-matched cohort group. However, quantitatively fewer adverse effects were reported for patients whose treatment was considered optimal on the basis of the evaluation criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Depot antipsychotic therapy frequently did not meet the criteria for optimal use. This did not affect length of hospital stay in these individuals. However, individuals who met the criteria experienced quantitatively fewer adverse events.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
R. R. Owen, E. P. Fischer, J. E. Kirchner, C. R. Thrush, D. K. Williams, B. J. Cuffel, C. E. Elliott, and B. M. Booth
Clinical Practice Variations in Prescribing Antipsychotics for Patients With Schizophrenia
American Journal of Medical Quality, July 1, 2003; 18(4): 140 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1996 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.