The Annals Summaries of the Latest Medical Research!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 472-475.
© 1996 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaber, L.
Right arrow Articles by Welshman, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jaber, L.
Right arrow Articles by Welshman, I.


Research Articles

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glyburide in young and elderly patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

LA Jaber, EJ Antal, and IR Welshman

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glyburide after acute and chronic dosing in young and elderly subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: Ten elderly (mean age 69.3 +/- 3.1 y) and 10 younger (mean age 45.6 +/- 4.5 y) patients received a glucose challenge test at baseline, with a 2.5-mg dose of glyburide at week 0 (acute dose) and again at weeks 6 and 12 of chronic glyburide therapy. Glyburide doses were titrated to a maximum daily dosage of 20 mg to achieve a glucose concentration of 7.8 mmol/L or less. During 24-h pharmacokinetic determinations at weeks 0, 6, and 12, serial blood samples were obtained for glyburide determination with HPLC. Serial blood samples for glucose, insulin, and C-peptide determinations were obtained at baseline (week -1) and at weeks 0, 6, and 12. RESULTS: All pharmacokinetic parameters assessed for glyburide were statistically comparable between the two age groups with the exception of a shorter time to peak concentration in the elderly at weeks 0 and 12. The glucose pharmacodynamic response to glyburide was not statistically different between the two groups. However, there was a statistically significant greater C-peptide response in the elderly group at all evaluation weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Aging appears to have no influence on the pharmacokinetics of glyburide. Observed pharmacodynamic differences indicate the necessity for dosage titration to a specified therapeutic response regardless of patient age.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1996 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.