The Annals Take our Readership Survey!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 926-934.
© 1996 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nightengale, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nightengale, B.


Research Articles

Quantifying the clinical significance of drug-drug interactions: scaling pharmacists' perceptions of a common interaction classification scheme

JS Roberts, ML Watrous, RM Schulz, RP Mauch, and BS Nightengale

OBJECTIVE: To develop a precise, interval level scale of the clinical significance of drug-drug interactions that reflects the professional judgments of practicing pharmacists. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 63 practicing pharmacists representing hospital (clinical and staff) and retail (chain and independent) practice settings. METHOD: Pharmacists judged the similarity among 15 interaction categories that have been commonly used to classify drug-drug interactions. A multidimensional scaling technique produced a spatial representation (i.e., a psychological map) of the structure inherent in those similarity judgments. Pharmacists' ratings of clinical significance were projected onto that same spatial representation using a multiple regression procedure, and the resulting information was used to develop a scale of clinical significance. RESULTS: The clinical significance scale developed from pharmacists' judgments was substantially different from a comparison scale published in a popular reference. The new scale was more precise than the comparison scale, and it also approximated an interval level of measurement. The judgments used to produce the new clinical significance scale were not reliably influenced by pertinent demographic characteristics of the sample. CONCLUSIONS: Inconsistencies between published clinical significance scales and the professional judgments of practitioners could affect patient care to the degree that a summary measure of clinical significance affects a practitioner's response to a potential drug-drug interaction. The clinical significance scale developed in this study has good measurement characteristics and reflects the professional judgments of practicing pharmacists. Use of the new scale is recommended on these grounds, although further assessment of its generality is warranted.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
F. G. A. Jansman, A. J. A. Jansen, J. L. L. Coenen, J. C. de Graaf, W. M. Smit, D. T. Sleijfer, and J. R. B. Brouwers
Assessing the clinical significance of drug interactions with fluorouracil in patients with colorectal cancer
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., September 1, 2005; 62(17): 1788 - 1793.
[Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1996 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.