The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 15-22.
© 1997 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheffield, R
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheffield, R
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, L


Research Articles

Cost comparison of recombinant human erythropoietin and blood transfusion in cancer chemotherapy-induced anemia

R Sheffield, SD Sullivan, E Saltiel, and L Nishimura

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) with that of blood transfusion in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia from a healthcare system perspective. DESIGN: A decision analytic model. Baseline estimates were obtained from a review of clinical trials data and economic evaluation studies. SUBJECTS: Secondary data analyses of patients with advanced malignancies, excluding hematologic malignancies and metastasized solid tumors. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either leukocyte-depleted packed red blood cells (PRBCs) or rHuEPO 150 units/kg s.c. three times per week for 6 months (24 wk). After 6 weeks, if rHuEPO recipients did not display a response, they received rHuEPO 300 units/kg s.c. three times weekly for the duration of therapy. If rHuEPO recipients still exhibited no response, they were given blood transfusions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For a treatment period of 24 weeks, approximately 64% of rHuEPO recipients responded at an average expected cost of $12971 per patient. One hundred percent of transfusion recipients responded at a cost of $481; this resulted in a cost savings of $8490. Variation of response rates for rHuEPO or PRBCs did not appreciably lower costs. Lower rHuEPO dosages and higher numbers of transfused units of PRBCs yielded approximately equivalent costs; however, these strategies may not be clinically prudent. CONCLUSIONS: From a healthcare system cost and outcome perspective, blood transfusion is the preferred strategy for chemotherapy-induced anemia. However, rHuEPO may be considered an effective blood-sparing alternative for patients with non-stem cell disorders. Future cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to assess more completely both the clinical and quality-of-life benefits rHuEPO may contribute to individual patients' lives and to society overall.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
D. Cella, D. Dobrez, and J. Glaspy
Control of cancer-related anemia with erythropoietic agents: a review of evidence for improved quality of life and clinical outcomes
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2003; 14(4): 511 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P.-Y. Cremieux, B. Barrett, K. Anderson, and M. B. Slavin
Cost of Outpatient Blood Transfusion in Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., July 14, 2000; 18(14): 2755 - 2761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1997 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.