The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 31, No. 10, pp. 1249-1252.
© 1997 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Comcowich, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tsunoda, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Comcowich, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tsunoda, S.


Research Articles

Ursodiol to prevent hepatic venoocclusive disease

SA Comcowich, TR Spitzer, and SM Tsunoda

VOD is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Although VOD may improve in some patients, severe cases are often fatal. There is no established therapy to prevent progression to severe VOD; nor are there any conclusive or universally accepted methods for prevention of mortality associated with severe VOD. A treatment that could minimize hepatic damage and cause VOD to manifest as reversible liver damage rather than a progressive, fatal disease would indeed have a place in posttransplant therapy. Nontoxic ursodiol may play such a role by replacing hepatotoxic bile acids. Based on the limited available literature (2 studies), it is difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the use of ursodiol to prevent VOD, although the preliminary results are promising. The studies, although small and not without weakness, suggested that ursodiol effectively reduces the incidence of VOD in allogeneic BMT patients. They do not, however, suggest that ursodiol is effective as treatment for existing VOD, as this was not studied. Also, conclusions were based on patients given busulfan and cyclophosphamide as conditioning therapy and thus might not apply to patients conditioned by other means such as total body irradiation. In summary, the available data do not definitively support the use of ursodiol; however, patients conditioned with busulfan and cyclophosphamide who are at risk for VOD (e.g., pretransplant liver disease, liver metastases) may be candidates for ursodiol prophylactic therapy. Larger, randomized clinical trials are warranted to further define the potential role of ursodiol for the prevention of venoocclusive disease of the liver in BMT patients.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1997 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.