|
|
|
||||||||||
Research Articles |
OBJECTIVE: To solicit practitioner-perceived opinions regarding current sedative/analgesic/paralytic practice including drug selection, admixture methods, and methods of assessing patient response to therapy via surgery tool; and to assess sedative/pain/paralytic drug use patterns including dosage, route selection, and combination therapy by collecting actual drug administration data from multiple centers. METHODS: Respondents completed a survey and collected drug administration data for 5 consecutive days in the intensive care unit (ICU) in which they practiced. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-eight members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy section and the Critical Care Practice Research Network of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy agreed to participate in the study. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent of the participants completed surveys, and 45% returned drug administration data collection forms. Patients received sedative/pain/paralytic therapy 62% of the 5 days studied. The most frequently received drugs were opiates, followed by benzodiazepines. Intermittent intravenous injection, oral/enteral, and continuous infusion methods were used in most patients. Combination therapy was used 25% of the time, with benzodiazepine/opiate combinations used most often (46%). Administration protocols were rarely used. Paralytic agents were occasionally administered without sedative/pain therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients received these agents during the majority of their ICU stay. Multicenter drug use data suggested a preference for opiate and benzodiazepine therapy. Many centers used continuous infusion therapy despite minimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic information on ICU patients. Further studies are needed to standardize end points, as well as obtain both pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and stability data in ICU patients.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Ballard, L. Robley, D. Barrett, D. Fraser, and I. Mendoza Patients' Recollections of Therapeutic Paralysis in the Intensive Care Unit Am. J. Crit. Care., January 1, 2006; 15(1): 86 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Arroliga, F. Frutos-Vivar, J. Hall, A. Esteban, C. Apezteguia, L. Soto, A. Anzueto, and for the International Mechanical Ventilation Study Use of Sedatives and Neuromuscular Blockers in a Cohort of Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 496 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Green, Y. Gidron, M. Friger, and Y. Almog Relative-Assessed Psychological Factors Predict Sedation Requirement in Critically Ill Patients Psychosom Med, March 1, 2005; 67(2): 295 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Rhoney and K. R. Murry National Survey of the Use of Sedating Drugs, Neuromuscular Blocking Agents, and Reversal Agents in the Intensive Care Unit J Intensive Care Med, May 1, 2003; 18(3): 139 - 145. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Chlan Integrating Nonpharmacological, Adjunctive Interventions Into Critical Care Practice: A Means To Humanize Care? Am. J. Crit. Care., January 1, 2002; 11(1): 14 - 16. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Soliman, C. Melot, and J.-L. Vincent Sedative and analgesic practice in the intensive care unit: the results of a European survey Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2001; 87(2): 186 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Weinert Epidemiology of Psychiatric Medication Use in Patients Recovering From Critical Illness at a Long-term Acute-Care Facility Chest, February 1, 2001; 119(2): 547 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Nelson and D. E. Meier Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit: Part II: Nelson JE, Meier DE Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit Part II Intensive Care Med 1999,14 189-199 J Intensive Care Med, July 1, 1999; 14(4): 189 - 199. [PDF] |
||||