The Annals Take our Readership Survey!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 228-236.
© 1997 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doran, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doran, C.


Research Articles

New approaches to using antiretroviral therapy for the management of HIV Infection

CM Doran

OBJECTIVE: To review the changes that have occurred in the past 2 years in the management of HIV infection with antiretroviral agents by contrasting the 1994 with the 1996 Guidelines. DATA SOURCES: Conference proceedings, clinical experience of the author and her colleagues, and English-language articles from the body scientific literature identified via MEDLINE, AIDSLINE, and Current Contents served as data sources. DATA SYNTHESIS: Current antiretroviral management strategies include movement away from using zidovudine monotherapy, institution of combination antiretroviral therapy earlier in HIV diseases, the use of newer agents such as lamivudine, protease inhibitors (i.e., saquinavir, ritonavir, indinavir), and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (i.e., nevirapine, delavirdine), prevention of vertical transmission with zidovudine, and use of HIV-1 RNA determinations (viral load) to guide the initiation and alteration of antiretroviral therapy. These strategies represent a dramatic change from the 1994 Guideline, which recommended zidovudine monotherapy in nonpregnant and pregnant individuals whose CD4 cell counts were less than 500 cells/mm3, when many of the newer agents were not available and the assays to determine viral load were strictly investigational. CONCLUSIONS: The difference between the 1994 and 1996 Guidelines is substantial. It is likely that within a year's time, newer information on pathogenesis and antiretroviral agents in development will be known and further management strategies will need to be disseminated. Until then, the International AIDS Society--USA Guidelines for 1996 should be followed as the standard of care.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CVIHome page
S. A. Schwartz and M. P. N. Nair
Current Concepts in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and AIDS
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., May 1, 1999; 6(3): 295 - 305.
[Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1997 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.