The Annals the journal of Pharmacy Technology
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 441-444.
© 1997 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tush, G.
Right arrow Articles by Anstead, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tush, G.
Right arrow Articles by Anstead, M.


Research Articles

Pralidoxime continuous infusion in the treatment of organophosphate poisoning

GM Tush and MI Anstead

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of organophosphate poisoning treated with a continuous infusion of pralidoxime chloride. CASE SUMMARY: A 27-year-old white man presented with extreme agitation, muscle weakness and fasciculations, and respiratory failure after ingesting an organophosphate pesticide (Dursban, active ingredients chlorpyrifos and xylene) as a suicide attempt. Atropine sulfate and pralidoxime chloride were administered intermittently, but the patient continued to be extremely agitated and have muscle fasciculations. Subsequently, a continuous intravenous infusion of pralidoxime (8 mg/mL concentration) at 500 mg/h was initiated to help control breakthrough nicotinic symptoms. Therapy with atropine and pralidoxime was continued for approximately 72 hours. Therapy was discontinued due to the predominance of anticholinergic symptoms and the patient's increased awareness. DISCUSSION: Severe organophosphate poisoning with nicotinic and/or central manifestations should be treated with pralidoxime in addition to atropine. The rationale supporting the use of pralidoxime as a continuous infusion in this case includes: (1) slow absorption of organophosphate compounds following exposure to large quantities, (2) unknown quantity ingested, (3) delayed nicotinic effects from redistribution of lipid-soluble organophosphate and metabolic activation of phosphorothioates such as chlorpyrifos, and (4) intensive care monitoring. There is limited documentation in the literature of continuous infusions of pralidoxime used to treat organophosphate poisoning and the stability of the admixture is unknown. CONCLUSIONS: A continuous pralidoxime infusion successfully managed the prolonged nicotinic symptoms seen after ingestion of an organophosphate. A continuous infusion of pralidoxime may be particularly useful in cases of organophosphate poisoning when the extent of chemical exposure or quantity of chemical ingested is unknown but potentially toxic and the therapy must be symptomatically managed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
R. Rahimi, S. Nikfar, and M. Abdollahi
Increased morbidity and mortality in acute human organophosphate-poisoned patients treated by oximes: a meta-analysis of clinical trials
Human and Experimental Toxicology, March 1, 2006; 25(3): 157 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
S Singh, D Chaudhry, D Behera, D Gupta, and S K Jindal
Aggressive atropinisation and continuous pralidoxime (2-PAM) infusion in patients with severe organophosphate poisoning: experience of a northwest Indian hospital
Human and Experimental Toxicology, January 1, 2001; 20(1): 15 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1997 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.