The Annals Summaries of the Latest Medical Research!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 720-723.
© 1997 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chaffin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chaffin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, S.


Research Articles

Suspected lamotrigine-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis

JJ Chaffin and SM Davis

OBJECTIVE: To describe a patient who developed toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) possibly secondary to lamotrigine use. CASE SUMMARY: A 74-year-old white man with a history of probable complex partial seizures was admitted to the neurology service for a prolonged postictal state. His antiepileptic regimen was changed while he was in the hospital to include lamotrigine. After 19 days of hospitalization and 14 days of lamotrigine therapy, the patient became febrile. The next day he developed a rash which progressed within 4 days to TEN, diagnosed by skin biopsy. All suspected drugs were discontinued, including lamotrigine. The patient was treated with hydrotherapy in the burn unit. His symptoms improved and he was discharged from the hospital 26 days after the rash developed. DISCUSSION: During lamotrigine's premarketing clinical trials, the manufacturer reported several cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and TEN. There are several published case reports of lamotrigine-induced severe skin reactions. All of these reports included patients being treated with both valproic acid and lamotrigine. Our patient was exposed to phenytoin, carbamazepine, clindamycin, and lamotrigine, but not valproic acid. The patient reported prior use of phenytoin with no skin rash. Carbamazepine was the antiepileptic drug the patient was maintained on prior to his hospital admission, and the symptoms of TEN resolved while he was still receiving carbamazepine. The patient received only two doses of clindamycin, which makes this agent an unlikely cause of TEN. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the temporal relationship of the onset of the patient's rash and several drugs that are known to cause severe rashes, it is not certain which drug was the definite culprit. However, based on the evidence from the literature, lamotrigine appears to be the causative agent.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. Duchowny, J. M. Pellock, W. D. Graf, C. Billard, J. Gilman, E. Casale, G. Womble, M. Risner, and P. Manasco
A placebo-controlled trial of lamotrigine add-on therapy for partial seizures in children
Neurology, November 1, 1999; 53(8): 1724 - 1724.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
R. D. Sontheimer, K. R. Houpt, H. Bocquet, M. Bagot, J.-C. Roujeau, R. G. Schlienger, and N. H. Shear
DIDMOHS: A Proposed Consensus Nomenclature for the Drug-Induced Delayed Multiorgan Hypersensitivity Syndrome
Arch Dermatol, July 1, 1998; 134(7): 874 - 876.
[Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1997 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.