The Annals Summaries of the Latest Medical Research!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 782-785.
© 1997 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Guthrie, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Guthrie, S.


Research Articles

Depression in primary care: review of AHCPR guidelines

LJ Cohen and SK Guthrie

OBJECTIVE: To present an overview and evaluation of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of depression. INTRODUCTION: One responsibility of the AHCPR is the development and periodic review and update of clinical practice guidelines. This process is undertaken by an independent panel composed of groups of clinicians and other experts from the private sector. Their findings are published in a four-volume, softcover set of booklets. DATA SOURCE AND EVALUATION: Volume 2 in the four-volume set includes a comprehensive complication, synthesis, and critical evaluation of the studies of different treatments for depression. Studies included for evaluation were randomized, prospective clinical trials that were pertinent to all topics concerning the treatment of depression. In some areas, the opinions of the panel were included due to a paucity of data from well-controlled clinical trials. Each AHCPR guideline was followed by a code that indicated whether the strength of evidence supporting that guideline was based on good or fair research-based evidence, or whether it was based primarily on panel members' opinions. CONCLUSIONS: With regard to drug treatment, the guidelines are good. However, since these guidelines were published in 1993 they might be considered somewhat dated because more antidepressants have become available in the interim. Overall, the AHCPR guidelines reflect an extensive review of the literature provided by the panel, as well as input from a highly respected group of reviewers. The panel included physicians, a nurse, a social worker, a psychologist, and a consumer representative. Unfortunately, a pharmacist was not included on the panel. Input from pharmacy practitioners would have been valuable.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. L. Kravitz, R. M. Epstein, M. D. Feldman, C. E. Franz, R. Azari, M. S. Wilkes, L. Hinton, and P. Franks
Influence of Patients' Requests for Direct-to-Consumer Advertised Antidepressants: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, April 27, 2005; 293(16): 1995 - 2002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1997 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.